By Yaël Ossowski | Florida Watchdog
ST. PETERSBURG — Three Florida Supreme Court justices will have their fates decided by voters this fall, and it is drawing the ire of a growing number of political forces in the Sunshine State.
Justices in Florida are chosen by the governor, but only from a list of nominees put forward by the Judicial Qualifications Commission. Every six years following that appointment, judges are put through the merit retention process, allowing the voting public to decide whether to keep judges on the bench.
“The collective evidence of judicial activism amassed by these three individuals is extensive,” RPOFL spokeswoman Kristen McDonald said in a statement.
She cited the decision of the court to put aside the death penalty for a man convicted of setting a woman on fire after tying her to a tree with car booster cables.
Similarly, the Florida Bar Association has encouraged voters to become informed on the issue, but instead tacitly supports retaining the judges so as to “keep politics out of court decisions,” president Gwynne Young told theDaytona Beach News-Journal.
Young was touting the very line used by many groups in the state, who have lined up to condemn the group Restore Justice 2012, a nonprofit voter education group warning of “activist judges” on its website and in promotional ads.
“Pariente, Quince and Lewis have made decisions that negatively impact issues important to families and taxpayers, yet the Bar wants to stress how polite they are,” wrote Restore Justice president Jesse Phillips in an Orlando Sentinel op-ed on Sept. 19.
Phillips said he was encouraged by the Republican Party’s new-found interest in the merit retention election.
“They’re responding to the grassroots, that really encouraged me,” Phillips told Florida Watchdog. “It’s nice to see some headway we’ve made.”
He told Florida Watchdog that the Florida Supreme Court “remains one of the most activist courts in the nation,” a point he reiterated in his commentary along with several specific criticisms of the judges’ decisions.
Phillips cites the mounting protests of critics who have come to defense of the judges without examining their records in-depth.
Read more: Florida Watchdog