The Difference between Expats and Immigrants? It’s Passports, Not Race

Immigration Restrictions Create Distinctions, Not Skin Color

Yaël Ossowski | March 26, 2015 | PanAm Post

Is classifying white westerners as “expats” and others as “immigrants” when they live outside their home countries racist?

That’s the question put forward by Mawuna Remarque Koutonin on the Guardian website last week: “Why are white people expats when the rest of us are immigrants?”

As
both an immigrant and expatriate, the former as a Canadian immigrant in
the United States and the latter as a Canadian expat in Austria, there
is a stark difference, but it’s not, as he claims, about race.

Koutonin
posits that the expat is a label “reserved exclusively for western
white people going to work abroad,” and the label of immigrant is “set
aside for ‘inferior races’” — even though they both mean a person who
“is temporarily or permanently residing in a country other than that of
[his] upbringing.”

Contrary to his argument, the distinction is more about how government classifies people and less about race.

It’s about passports: citizenship, borders, and travel and work visas. It’s about restrictions put in place by modern governments via
contemporary visa regimes. They’re the real culprit.

As I’ve claimed before, in the face of so many mounting government restrictions and obstacles to freedom, expatriation is often a favorable option. And it’s true that many people can’t do this, nor do they have the flexibility.

I
lived in the United States as a Canadian immigrant for over 15 years.
My family decided to move down south for economic reasons. It was a
permanent move I’m very happy we made.

Until
we received our US citizenship, though, we were immigrants. We would
have loved to have been expats, but you can’t just live and work on both
sides of the border without a lot of paperwork involved. That’s the
nature of modern government.

Later
in life, I left the United States for Austria, where I currently live
as an expat. I travel enough that I’m not a resident here, and I still
pay taxes to the US and Canadian governments.

Koutonin claims
this is the case because white people, such as Canadians or US
Americans, enjoy the “privileges of a racist system,” which divides
people based on social class, country of origin, and economic status.
But he’s only right on the second point. And it’s the only one that
should matter.

Following up with a post on Silicon Africa, Koutonin articulates that “white is not a skin color nor a race. White is a brand, a social status, an ideology.”

It’s
this privilege, Koutonin would argue, that deems my friends from my
native Canada or the United States who’ve recently moved to the United
Kingdom to be expats, and demotes a highly-qualified Nigerian living and
working in the same nation to the status of immigrant.

The
reason for the discrepancy, however, is not race, or societal
classification, but the pernicious division created by modern visa
regimes.

It’s
a sad fact that many people in certain nations have a hard time getting
the proper permissions to travel and cross borders. They’re often
denied visas without reason, and all application fees are
non-refundable. These are restrictions created and enforced by
governments.

In
most cases, countries seek visa agreements with each other in order to
bolster travel, trade, and commerce. Some have long-held relationships
which tie them together, and they’ve agreed to allow their citizens to
travel freely without asking specific permission or filling out reams of
paperwork.

This is what makes the Schengen Zone so attractive for those visiting or living in Europe, and why British passports are so sought after.

But citizens of many countries simply don’t have this benefit. And it’s based mostly on the diplomatic sphere.

The
passports of Finland, Sweden, Germany, the United States, and the
United Kingdom are the most powerful in the world, with access to 174
countries visa-free, according to the Henley & Partners Visa Restrictions Index of 2014.

Now,
is that because of race, or because diplomats, acting on behalf of
governments, have made many more visa agreements with other countries in
the world?

“Visa
requirements are also an expression of the relationships between
individual nations, and generally reflect the relations and status of a
country within the international community of nations,” says Henley
Partners, an international citizenship-planning firm.

It is much easier for someone from the United States to work or retire in Costa Rica than for someone from Costa Rica
to do the same in the United States. But that’s because the US
government created this obstacle for Ticos by requiring a visa, which
Costa Rica doesn’t require of US citizens.

It
isn’t an “outdated supremacist ideology” which labels white people
living in a foreign country as expats and all others as immigrants; it’s
governments. Simple as that.

Therefore,
let’s not assign culpability to racism embedded in the western psyche.
Rather, it’s the visa and border controls of the modern nation state.
They’re intended to restrict movement for as many people as possible, a
reality which has only been the case since World War I.

These restrictions are what drive thousands of refugees to stow away on unsafe ships to cross the Mediterranean to Europe, and why nearly 500 people perished in the desert attempting to reach the United States from Mexico in 2012.

What’s
the best way to safeguard against systematic bias against those from
certain countries? Open the borders. Relax current visa restrictions for
peaceful people who only wish to enjoy the privileges enjoyed by expats
everywhere: travel, cultural exchange, and better quality of life.

That’s why increasing numbers of people have signed the Open Borders Manifesto. And it’s why European Students For Liberty is organizing a conference with the precise theme of Open Borders. Positive immigration reform is only becoming a hotter and more pressing political topic in the United States.

Instead
of jockeying to find racism in who is an expat and who isn’t, we should
allow every individual to live and work where he or she wants.

Yaël Ossowski is a Canadian-American journalist and writer living in Vienna. He is founder and editor of Devolution Review, deputy director at the Consumer Choice Center, and senior development officer for Students For Liberty. He was previously a national investigative reporter at Watchdog.org. He has a Master’s Degree in Philosophy, Politics, Economics (PPE) from the CEVRO Institute in Prague and a Bachelor's in Political Science from Concordia University, Montreal. Born in Québec and raised in the southern United States, he currently lives in Vienna, Austria, and his writings have appeared in newspapers, magazines, and online outlets across the world in multiple languages.
Website https://yael.ca
Posts created 1613

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top