Duke researchers use race to attack charter schools

By Yaël Ossowski / April 21, 2015  /  Watchdog.org 

There’s a puzzling charge being lobbed at charter schools in North
Carolina by academic researchers: they’re reintroducing segregation.

That’s the racially tinged analysis provided by researchers
from Duke University, who last week released a study focused on the
“growing segmentation” of the charter school sector in the Tar Heel
state.

They claim schools in North Carolina are “increasingly serving the
interests of relatively able white students in racially imbalanced
schools,” all the while making the case that white parents want to avoid
schools with large numbers of black students.

That seems to counter the public and academic consensus that charter schools greatly benefit minorities and poor students, specifically forwarded by a 2013 Stanford University study analyzing academic performance of particular students.

“The state’s charter schools, which started out disproportionately
serving minority students, have been serving an increasingly white
student population over time,” say the authors of the Duke study.

The study shows that North Carolina’s charter schools enrollment of
white students has risen from 58.6 percent to 62.2 percent over the past
15 years.

But those charters have more than 30 percent enrollment by
African-American students while traditional public schools have just 26
percent, according to the North Carolina Office of Charter Schools.

In that case, it’s puzzling that the researchers would tend to focus
on increased white enrollment and claim it’s part of increased
segregation. Especially for a state with a population made up of more
than 20 percent African-Americans.

The Washington Post’s piece on the study
summarizes the findings by stating white parents are using charter
schools to “segregate” from the regular public school system.

To make such a claim, argues proponents, is preposterous.

“There is are no charter segments based upon race,” said Eddie
Goodall, executive director of the North Carolina Public Charter Schools
Association. “This is a thinly veiled and worn theme there that has
pretty much been laid to rest by public awareness and sophistication
over the post cap years.”

He told Watchdog.org the study hits the mark on the importance of
adding a “new market element” in public education, a claim that doesn’t
attack charter schools.

“Every parent should have access to a high performing district or a
high performing charter school, or both,” wrote Goodall in a written
response to the Duke researchers. “That’s the target. Allow the market
to work.

“Parents have chosen to ‘buy’ North Carolina charter education as
evidenced by the 68,000 students in our schools and the 44,000 waiting
at the schools’ doorsteps to get in,” said Goodall.

A phone call to the Duke University researchers for comment was not returned.

Yaël Ossowski is an international consumer activist and writer. His writings and interviews have appeared in newspapers, magazines, and online outlets across the world in multiple languages. He is founder and editor of Devolution Review, deputy director at the Consumer Choice Center, and senior development officer for Students For Liberty. He was previously a national investigative reporter at Watchdog.org. He has a Master’s Degree in Philosophy, Politics, Economics (PPE) from the CEVRO Institute in Prague and a Bachelor's in Political Science from Concordia University, Montreal. He currently splits his time between Vienna, Austria and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Website https://yael.ca
Posts created 642

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top